WHATCHU TALKIN BOUT WILLIS?

I grew up when Diff'rent Strokes was a popular television show. That's no big deal unless your last name is Willis. To this day I still hear those famous words popularized by Arnold: "Whatchu talkin bout Willis?" Usually they are uttered by someone looking at me as though I may have never heard it before. Yeah, right! Well this blog is what I (Willis) am talkin bout...my thoughts, observations & opinions. Enjoy...



Sunday, September 28, 2008

Preview of Vice Presidential Debate?

I do like Governor Palin and I hope she holds her own in the upcoming debate, but this video is pretty funny. I had watched a clip of her with Katie Couric and thought she struggled a bit and than I thought briefly about the famous Miss South Carolina contestant video. Then the very next video I select is this - lol!

41 comments:

Larry said...

You just said you like her and she's a moron in the same sentence Dave----now I feel better believing in the things you oppose!

She's Bush with glasses and lipstick. A moron---AND a criminal. and she also makes the RIDICULOUS claim that she knows about foreign policy beceause Alaska is beside Russia! Come on, Dave!---and she talks like freaking Frances McDormand in Fargo. I guess I could be President since Im alot closer to Washington DC than she is!

She doesnt even know what the Bush doctrine is! I knew that! Im more qualified than she is!

David H. Willis said...

No actually I didn't. Again your failure to readwith any precision and/or grasp humor is glaringly evident. Just because someone stumbles anwering a question doesn't mean I can't like her or some of her positions and actions as a Governore. Dude, you are just looking for something to criticize nonstop. You really must be depressed.

Larry said...

Just because she stumbles answering a question? Do you seriously want me to list all the stupid things she has said in just the brief month she has been in the spotlight? You dont really want me to do that, do you? Because, I can...with ease.

Oh, and the video from her church where she prays to be free of witchcraft is classic too. Is she Satanic? Why would you need to pray to be free of a such a specific thing as witchcraft? Does she have a personal obsession with it?

William Mckinley Dyer said...

Dang Larry, seriously man. I dont care if you are an Agnostic you dont have to be disrespectful. I mean everytime i read one of your comments its some sort of jerkish statement. Learn to disagree and bring rebuttals with some class.

Larry said...

There's no way for me to ever attain respect---Im an agnostic, remember? Im using YOUR logic. See how silly it sounds when it's used against you? As far as my statements about Palin---Im tired of being nice and respectful to politicians---they deserve scrutiny becausr 99% of them are not just immoral, but criminals who should be in jail.

David H. Willis said...

Here we go: The man with no real basis for morality is again judging others for what he persceives as immorality.

William Mckinley Dyer said...

Who ever said your religious beliefs dictated whether you were a respectable person or not? Def not me. I dont care what you say about politicians im just pointing out your blatant disregard to reply to anyone on this blog with any respect.

Larry said...

for what I "perceive"??? Oh, so her firing a trooper in her state and the abise of power charge is something I "perceive"?? wow!

Larry said...

funny Dave how you say I have "no real basis for morality" when I voted for a still support the most moral, respected and most importantly CONSISTANT candidate among all the ones running? When others have chosen immoral, corrupt Neo-con John McCain? I guess the founding fathers had no real basis for morality either since hardly ANY of them were Christians! Your foot gets caught in your mouth so much you might have to start putting odor eaters on your tongue.

David H. Willis said...

Larry,

Is that another one of the lines that you learned at the Alex Jones conspiracy nut school?

So you voted for Ron who rejects your 9/11 drivel. Good for you. You didn't let your convictions keep you from voting for the right guy!

Larry said...

EXACTLY, I dont let my PERSONAL issues get in the way of the truth---youre FINALLY getting it. Oh and by the way Dave----the whole "Ron Paul doesnt even believe in it" is getting old---time for a new talking point. That's called "spin"--when you try to divert from the REAL issue by using using something that has NOTHING to do with anything as yout tag line for diversion. Ive said it before and Ill say it again---since you need things repeated. The 9-11 truthers support Ron Paul for one reason ONLY, his stance and convictions to the Constitution---thats it...period. Because we feel that the attacks never would have happened unless the Constitution was followed and because of the takeover of Neocons (NOT Republicans) in Washington---Ron Paul was the ONLY choice, not just the best one. Do you need that repeated 2 days from now?

Larry said...

You mean the "drivel" that you've YET to debunk? Do you mean the "drivel" that youre AFRAID to challenge me on in a public debate? Hmmmm. Dave's afraid of ME---the "kook"! By your CONSTANT ignoring and refusal to debate me, you are basically admitting FEAR to take me on. Tell me dave--whats the REAL reason you dont debate me? Im not buying the "not a priority" crap. It's complete 100% FEAR. If it's not fear--then PROVE it! Debunk something...ANYTHING Ive already posted. Debunk just ONE thing Dave--thats all Im asking for---just ONE. Can you even debunk ONE thing?

William Mckinley Dyer said...

Again Larry this has nothing to do with your religious beliefs but just go read your last comment about odor eaters and explain to me how that isnt rude??? You can be agnostic and be respectable at the same time. I dont understand why you have so much hate inside u

David H. Willis said...

Larry,

A little repitition helps: PROVE YOUR POINT. Incocent until proven guilt. You have not proven your bogus assertion that President Bush is responsible for the grand plot you alledge. I don't need to debunk anything. That's empty rhetoric. Make an assertion and if it's not debunked it's true. Okay Larry I'll debunk you wen you prove that bigfoot doesn't exist.

boogaloo said...

Wow… this place blew up while I was gone.
It is so good to hear from you Larry. I love you bro. it has been a long time. I have to admit, you are sounding a lot like that crazy uncle we all have, we love him we just don’t talk about him much outside of the family.

David H. Willis said...

Boogaloo,

Welcome back. It's good to "hear" from you. I'll be checking your blog. Take care bro.

Larry said...

This just proves you dont read anything I say Dave---never said Bush was involved---never said it , not even ONCE----but you LOVE to spin and use that to make us sound crazy. Funny how you keep DODGING my question of debunking me by saying "Innocent until proven"-----funny, Popular Mechanics did an entire book that was "debunking" our claims----which they failed, as David Ray Griffins book in response to their points out brilliantly. If PM believed in the "innocent until proven" crap---they wouldnt have even made a book!

Like I said HUNDREDS of times--but u fail to hear---we dont have to PROVE who was directly responsible, we only have to prove the cover-up is there---and we HAVE, 100 times over. If you find a man on the side of the road shot to death and you can see the holes in his body-----do you need to know who the ACTUAL person was to validate that hes been shot? NO< you dont. But by saying "innocent until proven" to me---youre basically telling me that the dead man wasnt really dead because Im not giving you the video tape of the man shooting him! INSANE!!

David H. Willis said...

Innocent until proven"-----funny

No it's actually justice.

So you don't know who is responsible for 9/11, huh? Are you saying Bush & Cheney were not involved in 9/11?

Larry said...

Dave, I have a MUCH better question:

What is your evidence the governments story is true? Their story is a THEORY too. In fact, there's more evidence its NOT true.

Give me ONE proven FACT that Bin Laden/hijackers carried out the attacks----just ONE. The FBI doesnt even list 9-11 as one of his offenses! Look it up on www.fbi.gov!! 9-11 is NOT there! Hes not even been indicted for it!

Wheres YOUR evidence the OFFICIAL story is true? Im listening...

David H. Willis said...

Offical story: Planes hit the towers. Eye witnesses & video evidence = fact.

You don't know who did it, right? Admit it or prove otherwise. If it's an "inside job" who is inside and who did the job?

I'm not an apologist for the offical story BUT you are an authority on theses matters so tell me who did it and provide proof please.

Also,I'm still waitng on whether or not you believe planes hit the twin towers.

Larry said...

Dave, your stupid poll is misrepresentative to even MY views, because you dont read anything I say. It was Black Ops---a very very small rogue element of the government. They EXIST Dave, despite the fact that you think America is Bibleland and we are all goodie goodie Christians who never do any evil and we all skip through the meadows all day long singing happy little tunes and the government loves us and only wants the best for us and NEVER ever want us hurt in anyway and never lies to us and everything is all perfect in Bibleland, la dee da. Im gonna go sing "He's got the whole world in his hands now"--lol

My goodness, you're even SPINNING on your POLL! LOL Add "rogue elements of the government". You wont, because YOU exclude things just like the 9-11 commission did. You exclude the truth to advance your agenda. By the way, the people that come to this blog are all morons who ALREADY believe in the Bible, which is the biggest fairy tale of all time---so of course they will believe in the fairy tale that it was al Qaeda. al Qaeda doesnt even exist Dave, its another boogeyman so we have reasons to invade other countries. As long as we have an unseen boogeyman, we can do whatever we want. If theres an alQaeda---PROVE they exist Dave. Oh you mean the terrorists that are in Iraq NOW? The insurgents fighting for their country back? The ones who werent even there BEFORE our invasion?

Talking to you is worse than talking to my mother, because even she doesnt even buy the Bible fairy tale!

Larry said...

Already answered that you moron----I answered it in the very NEXT post after you asked it! YES, planes hit the towers---and I also said the Pod story is irrelevant. MORE evidence you dont even READ my posts!!!

Larry said...

THIS was my response in the very NEXT post after you asked the "planes hitting towers" question:

"..and to answer your question----yes, planes hit the towers---and the towers were also DESIGNED for plane impacts according to the VERY MAN who designed the towers, Frank DeMartini--who said they were designed for MULTIPLE plane impacts--- he said it on a PBS special 8 months before 9-11. Its on TAPE, not in some obscure book---why dont they show that clip on FOX News? Hmmmmmmm??????"

You IGNORED it, AS USUAL-----MORON!

You IGNORED it because if you had addressed it, you would have been PURPOSELY ignoring my comment about Frank DeMartini who said the towers were designed for MULTIPLE impacts---I even sent you the link of him saying this (another link you IGNORED Im sure)

Larry said...

All 12 buffoons put that it was al Qaeda (a non-existent boogeyman created by the CIA) and Bin Laden, who the FBI has not even indicted for 9-11, nor is 9-11 on his profile page on www.fbi.gov----got some REAL independent thinkers on your site Dave! You must be PROUD! lol

Larry said...

I guess Bin Laden did it then Dave! He's leading your phony, misrepresentative poll!!! LOL

David H. Willis said...

We are all morons now! Just brilliant Larry and a bunch of Bible thumpers. Prove that "Black Ops" did 9/11 then...

So are you gainfully employed these days or are you profitting off the 9//11 truther movement in some way?

boogaloo said...

Wow... I’m trying to catch up on all of the posts. I realize I am an idiot, but back in my day, a neo-con was a democrat, Or a liberal who lost faith in the basics of their ideology and voted republican. I assume the definition I’m familiar with is dated and moronic. Could someone help me out with the new definition of neo-conservative.

Larry said...

Mark, A Neocon is basically a "new conservative"--it transcends political party. Ive studied Leo Strauss, he was considered the father of Neoconservatism. In a nutshell, it basically teaches that we (Americans) dont desreve our liberties and thus should be taken away from us. Neocons are also major warmongers, pushing for war (even if unconstitutional and illegal, which is what the Iraq war is) and most times even when they have NEVER served themselves (known as a chickenhawk). McCain is not a chickenhawk though, he served, but nonetheless is one of the top Neocons in Washington. Obama is one too. Palin is quickly becoming one. She just met with Henry Kissinger last week----warmonger and king of the Neocons and a despicable human being. Palin is quickly getting her dose of Neoconservatism 101. This is why I hate FOX News---its the Neocon channel and one of FOX News's analysts Bill Kristol is the son of Irving Kristol, a student of Leo Strauss. (But what do I know? Im a "kook" on this site. I know "nothing" yet have never been debunked ONCE)

Heres an EXCELLENT article on Neoconservatism:

http://evatt.labor.net.au/publications/papers/112.html

David H. Willis said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
William Mckinley Dyer said...

It amazes me how Larry call You (Dave) a moron for not reading his comments yet he hasnt responded to my comments to him. Hmm may i say hypocrite???

David H. Willis said...

As my old coworker used to day "Truth is stranger than fiction." Larry is so busy firing off rants & insults and mulitple comments on different posts that he's probably just too busy to answer you. "Truthers" come at you with a barrage of stuff and ignore things that are inconvenient for them. And he's got a lot of research to do & these investigations are time no doubt consuming I'm sure.

Larry said...

funny Dave---youve ignored 95% of what Ive said, and you have ADMITTED you did! Hmmmmmm----hypocrite?

I ignored Dyer because there's no sense arguing with one of your butt-buddies who would agree with you if you said Santa Claus was real. The very people who Dave condemns (truthers) are the very people he's AFRAID to debate! LOL

Funny how you say Im the one who ignores when you have still YET to answer me on the public debate Ive invited you to 8 times! LOL

David H. Willis said...

I think the percentage is moving up all the time.

Larry said...

Once again youve ignored an invitation to debate-----Dave is afraid of me---lol.

David H. Willis said...

Larry "the loose cable guy",

Anyone that knows both of us knows how asinine that statement is. Don't you have video from prisonplanet you should be watching? Maybe you get a job and be productive at least.

David H. Willis said...

Loose cable,

This guy sw the light so there's still hope for you...

http://extruther.blogspot.com/2007/09/letter-of-resignation.html

David H. Willis said...

You'll enjoy this. Maybe this guy will entertain your angry truther schtick on his blog. (Yeah I know the blogger is an atheist).

http://lippard.blogspot.com/2006/11/loose-change-vs-popular-mechanics.html

Larry said...

Yeah, I saw it---what do these sites prove Dave? Its just more OPINIONS. In fact one guy on the Lippard blog said "Flight 93 was obliterated when it directly hit the ground"-----he KNOWS this? does he have video footage of it Dave? Theres more evidence the plane was shot down than crashed. There were even witnesses that even FOX NEWS talked to that said they didnt see pieces of it. You send me sites where these guys SPECULATE and give OPINION. How many crash sites have you ever seen where theres no chunks of the plane still there?

Who cares about the idiot who USED to be a truther. Proves NOTHING. Maybe he couldnt handle inconvenience, or criticism---or fighting for the truth. Im not a Christian anymore Dave---I guess (according to YOUR philosophy) that since I have abandoned religion like that guy has abandoned 9-11 truth, that makes Christianity a big LIE, huh? Even if I did believe it was all a lie, youre trying to make the point that just because ONE PERSON abandons it, that it makes it untrue. I might believe its untrue---but does my leaving it ALONE make that the case?

Youve lost your mind! You call that LOGIC Dave, wow!!

Larry said...

oh and by the way, I EXPOSED your FRAUDULENT spin on the Lippard blog. Ha Ha Ha!

David H. Willis said...

Loose cbale,

My point is that maybe they'd been interested in your nonsense, so why not go over there and debate them?

Larry said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.